SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT OF URBAN AREAS USING ADVANCED MODELING APPROACHES

Authors

  • Bakhrom Tulaganov1, Sirojiddin Mirzaev2, Shaxriddin Baymatov 3, Shakhnoza Samiyeva 4 Jasur Rashidov 5 1)Doctor of Philosophy in Technical Sciences, Associate Professor at Tashkent University of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Tashkent, Uzbekistan; 2)Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Professor, G.O.Mavlonov Institute of Seismology, Tashkent, Uzbekistan; 3) Tashkent University of Architeсture and Civil Engineering, Tashkent, Uzbekistan. 4) Tashkent University of Architeсture and Civil Engineering, Tashkent, Uzbekistan. Corresponding author, Е–mail: samiyeva_s@inbox.ru 5)Tashkent University of Architeсture and Civil Engineering, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.

Keywords:

seismic risk assessment,, urban areas,, structural vulnerability,, probabilistic modeling,

Abstract

Urban settlements located in seismic zones are increasingly vulnerable to devastating earthquakes, which pose significant threats to human life, infrastructure, and economic stability. Modern urbanization, combined with inadequate building practices and outdated infrastructure, amplifies the potential impacts of seismic hazards. This study presents a comprehensive overview of contemporary approaches to seismic risk assessment, including probabilistic modelling, vulnerability indexing, and scenario-based simulation using GIS and Big Data platforms. A critical comparison between international and national methodologies is provided, emphasizing practical and normative aspects. Uzbekistan serves as a case study to examine regional applications of seismic zoning, structural vulnerability assessment, and the use of simulation technologies for disaster mitigation. The paper concludes by discussing policy implications and the need for unified international standards that reflect both probabilistic uncertainty and geospatial variability in risk.

 

References

Rodríguez-Castellanos A., Bojórquez E., Bojórquez J., Ruiz S.E., Carvajal J., Leyva H., Payán O. Advanced intensity measures for urban seismic-risk mapping: Evidence from a megacity.

International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2025, 129, 105791.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105791

Nikolić Ž, Benvenuti E, Runjić L. Seismic Risk Assessment of Urban Areas by a Hybrid Empirical-Analytical Procedure Based on Peak Ground Acceleration. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(7):3585. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12073585

Zhou G., Zhu Z., Zhong J., Zheng W., Huang Y. Seismic damage mechanism of high-speed railway simply supported bridges considering spatial distribution characteristics of near-fault ground motions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2026, Vol. 200, Part B, 109864

Raab N. The Tashkent Earthquake of 1966: The Advantages and Disadvantages of a Natural Tragedy. Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas, 2014

Downloads

Published

2026-03-09